Thursday, March 14, 2013

wave theory at its purest



the essence of wave form theory (c)RS

wave forms essentially define reality
from the atom to the particles of dust in your vacuum the essential truth is wave form dynamics have defined vertically every form of reason we have defined within a subset of wave theory

from the realisation that circles of light interacting globulate generate atoms to the theories of light itself , almost all definitions used to define anything from gravity to electric fields and atoms them selves is defined pre eminently through wave theories ...

think about electrons ( move in waves ) atoms react to heat ( a wave ) by waving

the essential truth is wave forms define reality in all its forms

every thing from magnets ( a defined and steady wave ) electron spin (wave)

protons ... neutrons in fact everything you can dream of in reality is defined by wave theory without even defining a particle at all

a particle is in fact by definition a bent wave through multiple dimensional realities and not even a defined point but rather the centre of the wave form as defined through infinity and thusly is also summed to zero

define reality ? reaction and positive results from the formation of real objects and shapes through the defining wave form..

that is what a string theory truly is a wave form reality.

true light interaction is defined by its primary attribute and what is that :-)

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Star shap and formation and the forms it takes during an autopsy

Star formation and the forms it takes during an autopsy

 
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=115256048622797&set=a.114126102069125.22175.113077625507306&type=1&theater




http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dark-Matter/113077625507306

as we can see here the nature of the explosion will indicate the original layering and temperature of the materials forming the original material before it exploded..

so for instance we can see bright high energy matter has travelled further than its lower energy components that where passed through , presumably when travelling from the source of the explosion... at the centre or close to it...

the blue flaming aria for example is smooth in its content and thusly suggesting a light gas ...
one ejected from the star earlier in its life one might suggest...
or from the top of the star layers where it rode on the cushion of materials rising from underneath.

large dark patches reminiscent of the formation of the energy/magnetosphere...

yes overall a lot of tea leaves to read from such a good picture..

(c)RS


Thursday, March 7, 2013

Genetics and a study of



Genetic Manipulation and thought links

Modern genetic evidence of genetic shift link

another example of earlier evolutionary ^^ trends

modern manwe is so certain of its uniqueness and yet so unwilling to think about how this came to be..

earlier trends in genetic shift and mixing of the ancestors has left us puzzling over how to cover up obvious truths..

the genetic manipulation of populations to introduce traits that other genetic paths occupy,
has been done earlier in our history than the introduction of modern man or indeed genetic manipulation through the use of actual lab based gene swapping,

for examples :
the carrot
the potato
sheep
horses
weat
rice
ecetera

commonly it is assumed these days that genetic manipulation is the mainstay of a modern science ...
where as in fact it is much much older than that.

what we see today is an assumption of laboratory usage being necessary for genetic manipulation..
where as infact basic observation techniques are more than adequate in most cases..

this can for example be proved by the various types of dogs available today , most of which was made by creative breeding.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Bubbling ferment

Bubbling ferment (C)RS

when you look at space closely  it bubbles with the sub particle creation...
people might be wondering  : why is this happening ?

its simple : its boiling

to explain this is simple , Space is within a vast space of substance well below Zero kelvin..
in order for the universe to exist it constantly gives off energy ,
every day more energy is released to keep existence alive ,
what you are seeing is space boiling in a vacuum of vacuum's ,

entropy wants to win and it does so by sucking energy from life ,
Before you whine about this realise one thing ..

Life would not exist without it , in fact life is there because ; energy existed within chaos and another thing wanted it all ,
there is balance and thanks to that we exist.

maintain the balance because to much entropy would wipe us from history and too little would mean no existence at all.

Friday, February 8, 2013

holographic theory

the wonders of a theory that says every thing is inside every thing else....

for instance visual life holographic representation the visual system represents that at some median distance from the observer the hologram displays from a single point so that it is 2 triangles back to back...


now back in the days of Aristotle and beyond the triangle was used to represent the visual system ...
since this is entirely logical,

deeper analysys of holographic theory can yeald results like :

the entire universe is visible in a single piece...
all matter is interconnected and destroying a single piece effects the entire cosmos.
the universe is a fractal

yes holograms represent an image that from most angles will yield a result and if cracked will display the entire image ...
thus proving the wave entanglement of light is true , if both photons are of the same wave length..
for infact holograms prove light does entangle.

but if one is to presume that the image in ones retina is a hologram one must also prove that the light entangles across wave boundaries... or that the holograms merge in the eye.

now a perfectly logical presumption of light is that it bounces into your eye.. and forms an image.

However a hologram in the eye would mean a maximum resolution image existed in every receptor in your eye and if it did i imagine your eyes would function differently.

a hologram receiving eye only needs to be a few photons across and probably bugs would have them...

the perceived resolution of the image would be accurate to a single wave of light and of course that would be a lot of data...
forming a camera like that would mean a vertualy infinite camera sensor and thus no storage space on your camera and the need of a quantum processor to process the image...

in addition a fully copied picture at full resolution would effectively be a copy and real as you or me.

holographic theory is appealing and from the very fact a hologram exists at all means there are some features that are holographic (wave entanglement).

(C) RS

Saturday, January 19, 2013

electron light interaction theory

electron light interaction theory (C) RS

metals in particular express an idealised electron net or mesh where free electrons transfer between differing atoms

because metals are not transparent to normal light ( not xray for example )
we can prove basicly that the electrons act in their wave function durring the passage through metals

the reason being that the metal is not transparent to the normal light (red green blue)

however we can prove that lower energy levels interact to differing levels with the electron mesh and the energies from particles (electrons) within the atom ( where electron density is higher and energy absorption options are greater due to the weak and strong force , positive and negative charges etc)

however we can prove the electron web has absorption capacities limited by its energy level limits and thusly is transparent to some forms of light where the atoms themselves are the only absorbers of light.

thusly thin metals can be transparent as in the case of mirrors and mirrored glass

so the energy pattern absorption options available within the field of an atomic matrix , varies with heat , thickness and atomic bonding...

differing materials have differing interactions of electrons and thusly absorbtion and other features are modified by how closly to atoms the electrons are bound and also interaction patterns as with ions and the free electrons assume a common wave pattern across the solide

so that materials layered upon other compounds absorb the wave pattern of the sub layer
as a lake would absorb the wave patterns of a smaller lake connected to it.

so a material will affect another based on closeness and thickness of the materials.

quantum tunnelling has in part been due to the fact that a material that transfers electrons is close to a blocking material and that the wave pattern from absorbing materials and doped materials transfer to the closely meshed materials.

in short one material affects another through wave pattern dominance and sharing.

yours lovingly Rupert S

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Do anti particles move back in time

Do anti particles move back in time

I believed there is a high percentage chance they do ....
however logic would state that they not only appear before the hit but also at the end coordinates ?
while i hold the view that all inverse waves may do the opposite ,


With time being a vector it is possible for an anti particles time direction to be determined by the original vector of the originating particle and so logically any particle can move backwards or forwards as its inverse ?


(c) RS


To explain this simple appearing logic, The rules are simple:

Anti matter and mater have the opposite phase (wave pattern),

Inverting the wave of antimatter should prove that it is matter:

In rules that state matter and anti matter invert such as :

Atom + = Atom -
Proton + = Proton -
Electron - = Electron +

However if time is a wave pattern then by logic, 
The element (The wave) that responds to time; Can potentially be responded to in the opposite direction,
By that means we can suggest whether time is a wave.

Now by proving that time is not a wave; We can discuss whether time is an attribute of a wave,
Because we know that time does positively not respond to anti matter; As opposite in wave..
(Inverting in time and thusally travelling back in time)

However we have to prove if Anti matter is unstable, 

As we do not regard anti matter as unstable; We can state our proof that Anti matter does not respond the opposite in time.

Thusly we prove that time is ether not a wave, Or that the wave does not treat anti matter as anti-time.

Now you may be asking (What on earth does he mean?)

So stated thusly:

Holograph theory states that all space is stored in a wave state

The universe is inside a black hole theory; States that time begin's again.
(Under the logic of the theory; The universe is too big & the circumference too small,
The universe therefor being beyond the event horizon,

However in theory; All objects have a range upon which they cannot be seen
(Is this the event horizon? Possibly not),

Proving that the universe has a density beyond the rules of black holes mass
In general theory; Would indicate a simple rule of mass & gravity; As the only rule for black holes:

Mass = N
Field strength of atom = Fas
Gravity = G

When Fas = less than : M*G

Field collapses, Stored in what wave pattern ?

***

We can suppose that if Anti matter & Matter; Respond to time the same then one of two rules can be supposed:

Time is a vector (As proposed by me: RS)
or
The wave does not respond to Anti matter in any way different.

Anti time or in other words time travel; Should provide evidence of Matter & Anti matter that is inverse.

However we can therefor prove that Anti matter is not a time element based upon a harmonic wave pattern in matter..

We can scrap some Dr Who theory, However time travel would be immensely dangerous too us,

Inverting time would mean that: All the matter the traveller is made of is inverted,
Being inverted means the traveller is destroyed.

***

As a Vector time does not provably exist; Potentially..

As a vector; Time is potentially : Extrapolation of energy in a volume.

Thermodynamics is real, Time expressed as expression of thermodynamics ..

This still has problems, For example (What is time?)

Potentially : Volume (for example) V² or V cubic, with energy expression.

Thermodynamics in exactness.

(c)Rupert S